No green check, no workNo green check, no worknoomoo is an engineering harness for agentic software development.
Let coding agents plan, build, test, review, and ship software inside rules your team can actually enforce.
Instead of trusting what an agent says it did, noomoo checks what happened in the repository.
Built for teams moving from AI-assisted coding to autonomous software delivery.
Coding agents can already implement features, fix bugs, run tests, open pull requests, and respond to review.
That changes the problem.
The question is no longer:
Can the agent write the code?
AI made coding cheap. Verification is the new bottleneck.
The real questions are:
noomoo assumes this will happen. It does not try to make the agent perfectly obedient.
It turns the important parts of your engineering process into machine-verifiable rules.
Coding agents are probabilistic.
The agent reasons.
The system verifies.
Requirements, use cases, features, and tasks form a traceable chain.
The task says what must be true, not how the agent should code it.
Before work begins, noomoo checks structure, boundaries, links, and ambiguity.
If the task cannot be executed without guessing, work does not start.
The implementation plan becomes a versioned artifact covering implementation, contracts, tests, and decisions.
The coding agent implements, tests, reviews, fixes, and prepares delivery in an isolated branch or worktree.
noomoo checks Git, files, AST, tests, review artifacts, CI, and project-specific invariants.
If the required facts exist, the work moves forward.
If they do not, it stops.
Natural-language status is not proof. Repository state is proof.
noomoo can verify:
CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, prompts, and skills are useful.
But they still depend on the agent reading, remembering, interpreting, and following them.
noomoo is complementary.
Guidance
src/api/orders.ts → src/db/orders.repo.ts dependency rule violated → gate fails $ echo $? 1 ← commit not saved
Enforcement
noomoo can also answer:
CI checks the code.
noomoo checks the development lifecycle around it.
The question to ask:
Every answer is a candidate for a noomoo rule.
CLAUDE.md keeps getting longer;Current internal scale:
We use the same mechanisms internally that noomoo brings to other projects.
No green check, no work.
The goal is not maximum process. The goal is maximum safe autonomy.
No.
The coding agent executes the work.
noomoo defines and verifies the conditions under which that work is allowed to move forward.
No.
They are executors.
noomoo is the engineering control layer around execution.
No.
CI remains part of the evidence.
noomoo adds verification of task readiness, scope, review freshness, lifecycle state, and project-specific engineering rules.
Only where semantic judgment is actually useful.
If something can be verified deterministically from Git, files, AST, tests, CI, or another machine-readable source, noomoo should not ask an LLM to guess.
No.
It makes selected engineering claims independently verifiable.
The quality of those guarantees still depends on the quality of your requirements, tests, invariants, and checks.
Move the critical parts of your engineering process out of prompts, habits, and tribal knowledge — and into rules the system can verify.
Best suited for teams already using coding agents in production repositories.